There are many reasons why I don’t follow college football. The main reason is the national championship system. I don’t like the fact that one loss takes you out of the running for the national championship. Here is why.
I think losses as much as wins make you the champion. I think back to the 2006 Pittsburg Steelers. They lost big time to the Indianapolis Colts on Monday night in front of the whole nation when Marvin Harrison torched them for 80 yards on the first play of the game. You can’t tell me that loss didn’t affect their will to be a champion. The 2006 Indianapolis Colts went 3-4 down the stretch after starting 9-0. Loosing to bottom of the barrel teams (which are improving as we speak) such as
This is why it is so much more special when teams like the Pittsburg Steelers and the Indianapolis Colts win championships. The Lakers have so much money in the LA market that they can buy Shaq and orchestrate trades for Kobe Bryant.
About the same time the Colts were kickin ass and takin names, Tony Dungy’s son was going through a rough time. Every in American and around the world knows the outcome. But I believe this loss shaped the 2006 Indianapolis Colts, as the Monday night game did the ’06 Steelers.
The other thing I dislike about the College Football system is this. To win a championship you have to be lucky. I honestly feel had this tragedy not happened to the Colts family that 2005 playoff game could have turned out different. In fact I was out in
In college football the team that usually wins the national championship game is the best team that plays the easiest schedule. I don’t feel like
Everyone who has half a brain knows what needs to be done. There has to be a playoff system similar to March Madness. The only problem is that somewhere money changes hands and someone who makes a lot of it refuses to do it. The BCS was a great idea, but it is extremely flawed. It is less flawed than having the Associated Press pick a winner because all know how much sports writers really know.
The wonderful thing is that you could combine the best of both worlds. Have a playoff system, that uses the bowl format. In fact I took the time this weekend to create and elaborate system of bowls.
32 teams playing for one title, 5 games, winner take all. As for the bowl money I suggest one of two options. The first option and the one I would use would be for the losing team to get the money. The farther you go into the tournament the more money for the school. (Except for the final game of course) So if you lose in the first round you make X amount of dollars, second round more third round more and so on.
| | | West Bracket | | Bowl | Location |
| At Large #2 | | | | 1.Humanitarian | Boise |
| | | | | 2. Emerald | SF |
| 1 Humanitarian | | | | 3. San Diego | San Diego |
| | | | | 4. Las Vegas | Las Vegas |
| Pac 10 Champ | | | | 5. Holiday | San Diego |
| | | | | 6. Hawaii | Honolulu |
| | 5. Holiday | | | 7. Sun Bowl | El Paso |
| | | | | | |
| MNT West #2 | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| 2. Emerald | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| WAC #2 | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 7. Sun Bowl | | | |
| | | | | | |
| WAC Champ | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| 3. San Diego | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Pac 10- #2 | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | 6. Hawaii | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| MNT West #1 | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| 4. Las Vegas | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| At Large #1 | | | | | |
| | | South Bracket | | Bowl Game | Location | |
| At Large #2 | | | | 1. Outback | Tampa | |
| | | | | 2. Insite | Tucson | |
| 1. Outback | | | | 3. GMAC | Mobile | |
| | | | | 4. Armed Forces | Fort Worth | |
| SEC Champs | | | | 5. Alamo | San Antonio | |
| | | | | 6. Independence | Shrieveport | |
| | 5. Alamo | | | 7. Outback | Tampa | |
| | | | | | | |
| Conf USA #2 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| 2. Tucson | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| ACC #2 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | 7. Outback | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Conf USA #1 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| 3. GMAC | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| SEC #2 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | 6. Independence | | | | | |
| ACC Champ | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| 4.Armed Forces | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| At Large #1 | | G | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | MidWest | | Bowl | Game Site |
| At Large 2 | | | | Motor City | Detroit |
| | | | | Papajohns.com | Birmingham |
| 1. Detroit | | | | New Mexico | Albuquerque |
| | | | | | |
| Big 10 Champ | | | | Gator | Jacksonville |
| | | | | Liberty | Memphis |
| | 5. Gator | | | | |
| | | | | Cotton | Dallas |
| Sun Belt #2 | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| 2. Papa Johns | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Big 12 #2 | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | 7. Cotton | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Sun Belt Champ | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| 3. New Mexico | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Big 12 #2 | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | 6. Liberty | | | | |
| At Large #7 | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| 4. Music City | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Big 12 Champ | | | | | |
| | | East Bracket | | Bowl Game | Game Site | |
| At Large | | | | 1. Champs | Orlando | |
| | | | | 2. International | Toronto | |
| 1. | | | | 3. Meineke | Charlotte | |
| | | | | 4. New Orleans | New Orleans | |
| Big East Champ | | | | | | |
| | | | | 5. Peach | Atlanta | |
| | 5 | | | 6. Capitol 1 | Orlando | |
| | | | | | | |
| Independent #2 | | | | 7. Orange | Miami | |
| | | | | | | |
| 2 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| MAC #2 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | 7 | | | | |
| Independent #1 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| 3 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Big East #2 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | 6 | | | | | |
| At Large | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| 4 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| MAC Champ | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| MW Champ | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 1. Fiest Bowl | | |
| Tempe | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| East Champ | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | 3. National | |
| | Championship | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Rose Bowl | |
| | | |
| South Champ | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 2. Sugar Bowl | | |
| | | |
| New Orleans | | |
| | | |
| West Champ | | |
| | | |
| | | |
No comments:
Post a Comment